Artificial Intelligence has officially infiltrated every corner of our lives. It generates art, it writes code, there is nothing AI cannot do. Naturally, this technology has infiltrated into one of the biggest entertainment sector : Online Gaming (And no we are not talking about GPU and RAM prices).
While we know the video games industry is bigger than Hollywood, the conversation often stops at game development or anti-cheat systems. But at MyBoosting.GG, we wanted to investigate a narrower, often overlooked niche: The impact of AI on Boosting.
Can an algorithm really out-perform the raw intuition of a high-ELO veteran? We put it to the test.
The Experiment: AI vs. Human Intuition
To settle the debate, we conducted an internal study involving 267 active boosters across 10 distinct competitive titles, including League of Legends, Valorant, CS:GO, TFT, Overwatch, and Rocket League.
We split the boosters into two groups:
Group A (132 Boosters): Strictly used AI to dictate their builds, macro strategies, and decision-making flow.
Group B (135 Boosters): Relied solely on their own experience, human skill, and real-time deduction.
Special thanks to AccsUpgrade.com for providing the premium AI-ready accounts required to facilitate the automated portion of this experiment.
The Results: The "Human Gap" is Real
The data was shocking to those who believe AI is ready to take over the world, but perhaps unsurprising to true high-tier gamers. The human element didn't just survive; it dominated.
Boosters using their own skills (Group B) significantly outperformed their AI-assisted counterparts:
Where AI Failed: Specific Case Studies
To add depth to the data, we analyzed why Group A struggled. The AI faltered most in situations requiring psychological adaptation rather than mathematical optimization.
In League of Legends: The AI would consistently recommend "statistically optimal" engages based on Gold/XP differences. However, it failed to account for "tilt factor" or enemy positioning errors that a human booster exploits instantly.
In Valorant/CS:GO: While the AI suggested perfect economy management (when to save vs. buy), it couldn't predict the enemy team’s irrational aggression. Humans knew when to force a risky buy to break the opponent's mental momentum; the AI simply played by the book and lost.
Why Humans Still Win
The conclusion we reached is straightforward: AI is a generalist; Boosters are specialists.
AI models are trained on massive datasets, meaning their recommendations regress to the mean. They suggest builds and strategies that are "generally" good for the average player. However, boosting requires exploiting specific weaknesses in real-time, adapting to unscripted chaos, and making 1% plays that data hasn't predicted yet.
For a beginner, AI is a fantastic coach. But high-tier play is about nuance.
Take a complex service like Rainbow Six Siege boosting as a prime example. In a game with destructible environments, an AI might calculate the safest entry point, but a human booster knows which specific wall to blow up to psychologically terrify the defending team. That "gut feeling" is currently impossible to code.
The Elon Musk Prediction
This brings us to a controversial topic. Elon Musk recently tweeted his desire to pit a team of 5 AIs (with no special API access, seeing only what humans see) against a world-champion League of Legends team.
Musk is betting on the machines. Based on our data, we are betting on the humans.
While AI possesses perfect reaction times, it currently lacks the creative spark and psychological warfare capabilities that top-tier pros and boosters utilize to secure a win. Until AI can replicate the intuition of a veteran player, the best way to climb the ladder is still trusting a human expert.
USE DISCORD
